Walter J. Burien, Jr.
P.O. Box 42
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
(732) 790-9233
Walter J. Burien, Jr., ] INDICTMENT No. 06-02-00212
] FILE No. 05002797
vs. ]
] MOTION TO EXPIDITE A SIGNED
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY ] ORDER OF THE COURT
]
Plaintiff. ] HONORABLE
JUDGE Dennis V. Nieves
___________________________
New Jersey
State ]
]
ss.
Middlesex
county ]
Petitioner / Father, Sui-Juris hereby
submits the following MOTION TO EXPIDITE A SIGNED ORDER of the court for the
following good cause.
The here and now Defendant in the Administrative action 06-02-00212
captioned above, Walter J. Burien, Jr., has personal knowledge of, and is
competent to testify as to, each and every fact set forth.
1.
Defendant was incarcerated on 11/23/05 in the MCACI under $150,000
bail.
2.
Defendant though indigent was denied a Public Defender when requested
in writing on three occasions. Attached and marked within DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT
(A), page 9 marked in red lower right corner of page number 09, is a letter to
Lynn Kelly of the Financial Review Office requesting again on March 1st
2006, with cause a public defender for this defendant.
3.
A friend from the state of California, Dr. Norman Zadeh, upon learning
of the circumstances Defendant was under, looked for an attorney in Northern
New Jersey and was referred to a Marco Laracca, and subsequently in December
paid Mr. Laracca $5,000 to represent Defendant per pending charges levied
against Defendant by the County of Middlesex Prosecutor’s office. Attached and
marked DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT (B) is the fee agreement Mr. Laracca presented to
Dr. Zadeh to sign a day or two after depositing Mr. Zadeh’s check for $5,000.
There is no agreement signed between Defendant and Mr. Laracca.
4.
This Defendant upon learning that Dr. Zadeh secured an attorney from
Elizabeth, NJ for this Defendant, called Mr. Laracca several times collect from
the MCACI but Defendant’s collect calls were not accepted, or on two occasions
the office secretary answered and informed this Defendant that Mr. Laracca was
not there, try back after 4 PM and Defendant emphasized to the receptionist to
have Mr. Laracca stop by the MCACI to speak with this Defendant.
5.
Mr. Laracca did not speak with Defendant but did file a form one-page
bail reduction request for hearing letter without a supporting affidavit.
6.
A hearing was held in where Mr.
Laracca attempted to address the court without ever having talked to Defendant
or having heard any particulars from Defendant. Defendant at this hearing then
addressed the court asking if he could speak to this attorney for the first
time. The hearing was adjourned and Defendant spoke with Mr. Laracca for the
first time for about twenty minutes. The hearing then continued where at one
point Defendant interjected to give some background about himself being that
Mr. Laracca appeared to be void of any details relevant to Defendant and
appeared to not have retained any details hastily disclosed in the first
discussion he had with Defendant. Defendant requested that Mr. Laracca meet
with him before he left the court, Mr. Laracca did not further meet with or
discus the case with Defendant, and left the court at the end of the hearing.
7.
The Honorable Judge Nieves noted that the charges pending against
Defendant, bail should be at the maximum $50,000 and or significantly lower
than $50,000 at specific incremental levels below that amount, and that he
would be moving forward with a psychological evaluation of Defendant prior to
reducing bail. A return hearing was scheduled for January 6th 2006.
8.
Defendant reported back to Dr. Zadeh in California that the performance
of Mr. Laracca was at best the bear minimum and in fact probably exasperated
the duration of the bail reduction. Additionally, I informed and requested of
Dr. Zadeh that he should contact Mr. Laracca and require that he meet with and
discus the details of this case with Defendant at the MCACI or return the $5000
given to him. Dr. Zadeh sent Mr. Laracca an email and about a week latter Mr.
Laracca stopped by the MCACI and spoke with Defendant for about thirty-five
minutes in which time Defendant emphasized the point that he wished for Mr.
Laracca to move the court for bail of $15,000 or less come the hearing of
01/06/06. Mr. Laracca latter told Dr. Zadeh that he spoke with Defendant at the
MCACI for three hours. Well, the MCACI on that day has Mr. Laracca arriving and
then departing 50 minutes latter.
9.
Defendant attempted to call Mr. Laracca after this meeting at the MCACI
on several occasions prior to the 6th of January 2006, but his calls
were not accepted and Mr. Laracca was not reached.
10. On the 6th of
January 2006, Mr. Laracca made no attempt to meet with or talk with Defendant
prior to the hearing and at hearing presented no argument, what so ever to have
bail reduced lower that $50,000. When the court asked Mr. Laracca if he read
the psychological evaluation conducted on Defendant by Dr. Johnson, Mr. Laracca
replied yes and was silent. The court then asked him “did he have anything to
say?” he replied no. The court then set bail at $50,000 without Mr. Laracca
ever having argued bail for anything less let alone the $15,000 or lower that
Defendant had requested him to try and achieve.
11. On January 7th 2006, Defendant asked Dr.
Zadeh if he would pay the fee of $4,000 to a bail bondsman so that bail could
be arranged. He agreed with it understood it would be his last gesture for
assistance and $4,000 was posted with a bail bondsman on the 8th of
January which facilitated this Defendant’s release from the MCACI at 10:30 PM
the 8th of January 2006.
12. Defendant attempted to reach
Mr. Laracca at least ten times between January 9th 2006 and March 8th
2006, but only spoke with Mr. Laracca twice by phone. Once on January 10th
2006 for about ten minutes and once on March 8th 2006 for about ten
minutes. On or about February 7th
2006, I received a call from Mr. Laracca’s secretary telling me their was a pre-indictment
hearing set for February 22nd 2006, but that I did not have to
attend. On February 21st 2006, I received another call from Mr.
Laracca’s secretary telling me I had to attend the hearing scheduled for the
following day but Mr. Laracca did not need to be there. She told me that I
could apply for PTI though at this hearing. I attended, was told Mr. Laracca
must be there, and I could not apply for PTI being that the charge was a second
degree charge requiring a permission note from the prosecutor for me to apply
of which was not there. The case manager said that she would reschedule for
March 1st 2006, and if Mr. Laracca was not there then, I would be
leaving with my discovery and from that point be considered by the Court to be
Pro-Se. I called Mr. Laracca’s office, informed them that he was required to be
there and that the pre indictment was postponed until 03/01/06 and that if he
was not there, the court case manager was noting the file that I was Pro-Se and
no attorney represented me. March 1st 2006, I was present, Mr.
Laracca was not, the case manager noted I was now Pro-Se, I paid the court
$14.70 for discovery listed as 42 pages, then left. I called Mr. Laracca’s
office and was told he was on trial and could not be there. Within the next few days I tried to reach
Mr. Laracca by phone and was unsuccessful.
13.
Defendant wished to address and testify before the grand jury in his
case. He learned on February 22nd 2006, that the grand jury had
convened on February 2nd 2006, and that that opportunity to address
the Grand Jury had passed. Mr. Laracca nor any other party informed the
Defendant when or that the Grand Jury would meet on 02/02/06.
14. Defendant latter reviewed the
discovery provided by the Prosecutor’s office and found that the copies provided
were deficient, pages (WB) 10, 13, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 27 were missing.
Defendant prepared his reciprocal disclosure, 86 pages, and served it on the
Middlesex County Prosecutor’s Office on March 13th 2006, and
additionally in writing requested the missing seven pages of the 42 pages noted
from the Prosecutor’s disclosure be provided to the defendant at that time or
as soon as possible to his mail address. See attached DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT
(A), the cover letter received stamped by the
Middlesex County Prosecutor’s office on March 13th 2006, containing
the 86 pages of Defendant’s disclosure provided. As of the 19th of
March 2006, the seven missing pages requested from Ms. Brown of the
Prosecutor’s Office, this Defendant has not received.
15. Defendant does not have the
resources to return to his home and family in Arizona and commute between
Arizona and New Jersey for trial. Defendant is living in his motor home, on
public assistance from Middlesex County Social Services case number CO
76003812, and the assistance provided by Dr. Zadeh was for the $5,000 and then
$4,000 and Dr. Zadeh will be providing no more assistance.
16. Mr. Laracca was reached by
Defendant about March 7th 2006, and his only comment noted was that
he wanted more money, and I said to him $5,000 was paid to him to represent
Defendant at trial and he said no, only to indictment. I asked him if that were
the case, and being that he has done virtually no hands on work of any
consequence per this case, which included missing the last two required appearances
by him, how much of the $5,000 was he going to return. His reply was “Good luck, have a good day,
goodbye.” I have not spoken to Mr. Laracca again but I did get a message from
his office on my voice mail March 15th 2006, with his secretary wanting my mailing
address, something any attorney representing a client should have had from day
one. I did not reply and note I have not received anything from Mr. Laracca
excluding the one page letter for bail reduction I received at the MCACI in
December of 2005.
17.
Defendant is indigent at this
time, and when Mr. Laracca was contacted and then paid $5,000 by Dr. Zadeh, this was to represent Defendant
at trial. Only after payment to him did Mr. Laracca provide a fee agreement,
which in fact notes contrary representation of Defendant over the reasons he
was contacted and paid $5,000. Defendant believes Mr. Laracca has been grossly
overpaid for the actual work and time he has expended per this case and
requires the return of a significant portion of moneys paid Mr. Laracca to
represent him at trial of which it is now apparent to Defendant that Mr.
Laracca will not be doing and Defendant requires a public Defender be
appointed.
18.
Defendant has requested discovery and correction of the court record from
the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS)and has yet to
received a signed order of the court to facilitate the same. See DEFENDANT’S
EXHIBIT (A) red corner marked pages 02, 03, 04 with emphasis given to page 04.
Defendant moves to have the Honorable Judge Dennis V. Nieves sign an order to facilitate the discovery
Defendant requires and DYFS is now clearly in default of providing to this
defendant as was specified and shown within Defendant’s EXHIBIT (A).
Whereby
this Petitioner requests the attached order be EXPIDITED for signing this day
by the court upon presentment and a true copy of this ORDER now signed by the
court then be sent US Mail to the Respondent New Jersey Division of Youth and Family
Services (DYFS); their council Deputy Attorney General Michael Anthony Amatia; Lynn Kelly, Financial Review Office of Middlesex
County; Mr. Marco Laracca; and this
Petitioner by the Clerk of the Court.
Respectfully submitted this
20th day of March 2006.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
_____________________________________ Walter J. Burien, Jr. - Sui Juris
ORINAL of the foregoing HAND
DELIVERED this
20th day of March, 2006, TO:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY Superior
Court
CLERK OF THE COURT
1 JFK Square
New Brunswick, NJ 08903
ORINAL of the foregoing motion
without attached exhibits HAND DELIVERED this
20th day of March 2006, TO: Marco Laracca
_____________________
Walter J. Burien, Jr.
P.O. Box 42
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
(732) 790-9233
IN THE
SUPERIOR COURT
COUNTY
OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY
WALTER J. BURIEN, JR., ] INDICTMENT No. 06-02-00212
] FILE No. 05002797
vs. ]
]
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY ] ORDER
]
Plaintiff. ] HONORABLE
JUDGE Dennis V. Nieves
___________________________
This matter having
come before the Court and having
reviewed and considered the Defendant’s request for an ORDER of the court,
fully advised in the premises;
IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the Defendant’s requested relief is granted.
1. The New
Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services, hereinafter called DYFS, for the
purpose of discovery and disclosure requested by Walter J. Burien, Jr. shall
within ten (10) days of this ORDER send CERTIFIED copies of any and all; past
or present; reports; notes; communications; pictures; recordings; that any
party provided to DYFS or that was generated by DYFS relevant to FN-12-153-06
and the taking of John Joseph Burien DOB 07-08-99 by DYFS on 11/23/05 and
subsequent return of the child to Arizona on 12/14/05; All copies sent Mr.
Burien SHALL BE UNALTERED AND WITHOUT DELETIONS and sent US Certified mail to;
Walter Burien, P. O. Box 42, E. Brunswick, NJ 08816;
2. Marco
Laracca having withdrawn from this case shall return to Dr. Norman Zadeh within
three business days
dollars of the $5,000 paid Mr. Laracca by Dr. Zadeh for the
representation of Walter J. Burien, Jr. per charges levied against Mr. Burien
in this case file 05002797;
3. Lynn Kelly, of the Financial Review Office of
Middlesex County, upon the verification through Middlesex County Social
Services that Walter J. Burien, Jr. is and has been since November 23rd
2005, indigent, shall immediately acknowledge and move in fulfilling Walter J.
Burien, Jr. request for assignment of a Public Defender.
4.
The Clerk of the Court
this day shall deliver a copy of this ORDER the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family
Services (DYFS); their council Deputy Attorney General Michael Anthony Amatia; Lynn Kelly, Financial Review Office of Middlesex
County; Mr. Marco Laracca; and the
Petitioner Walter J. Burien, Jr. at their listed addresses on file with the
court.
DONE IN OPEN COURT this ______day of March 2006.
_______________________________
HONORABLE JUDGE Dennis V.
Nieves